|
|
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:36:50 +0000
In <7lasscF3bdefpU1@mid.individual.net> on Tue, 3 Nov 2009
14:26:04 -0000, "kat" <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid> said:
>
>> In uk.net.news.management on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:40:31 +0000, Molly
>> Mockford <nospamnobody@mollymockford.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> At 23:38:02 on Sat, 31 ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for
Chibal)
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:26:25 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:49:50 +0000, Geoff
Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:28:14 -0000, "kat" <kat.news@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
>
>>So, here I am in a weird position. I am on the committee, and supposed to
>>be businesslike, and according to some, have no ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for
Chibal)
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:13:17 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:54:03 +0000, Geoff
Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:41:36 +0000, Cherry Chapstick
> <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote:
>
>>>Interesting that your spell checker did not try to change committe to
>>>committed.
>>
>>I'm not using a ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for
Chibal)
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:14:17 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:44:37 +0000, jms
<moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
> Do you think that you are arrogant?
Damn. It's time to upgrade the Irony Meter firmware again.
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:55:21 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:02:01 +0000, Geoff
Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:04:51 +0000, Molly Mockford
> <nospamnobody@mollymockford.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>At 00:07:18 on Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote
>>in <1j8j1ix.xvc9fhgewctgN%%ste ...
|
Comments on First CFV - UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:35:39 +0000
In message
<cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091023210735$1561@gradwell.net>, Barry
Salter <bsalter@ukvoting.org.uk> writes
>FIRST CALL FOR VOTES (OF 2)
< much snipped >
>1) One person, one vote.
>
>2) No two voters may vote from the same email address.
> In the event that only one address is available ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
03 Nov 2009 12:28:50 +0000 (GMT)
In article <1j8lqz6.v3nlbq10ju5zkN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>,
Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote:
>Jonathan Amery <jdamery@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>> except that he seems to believe that anyone who hasn't been posting in
>> unn* for over 5 years is unprintable in some manner, shape, or fashion.
>
>Absol ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
03 Nov 2009 12:24:35 +0000 (GMT)
In article <1j8lqef.15qzcth101ip0fN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>,
Sn!pe <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>BTW, just out of idle curiousity and to display my own prejudice,
>are you a cyclist?* I note also that you post from chiark, irrelevant
>as that no doubt is. I'm afraid I'm just the kind of chap who like ...
|
Re: Vote canvassing?
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:14:23 +0000
In uk.net.news.management on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:43:37 +0000, jms
<moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:38:42 -0000, "Clive George"
> <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>"Molly Mockford" <nospamnobody@mollymockford.me.uk> wrote in message
>>news:w80g03B$eM7KFwOK@molly.mockford...
>>
> ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
03 Nov 2009 11:35:19 +0000 (GMT)
In article <hcn35r$2ro$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
Tony <tony@darkstorm.co.uk> wrote:
>Neither is 100% valid, but people *new* to this group didn't seem
>interested in the hierarchy management, and now they are, but maybe they
>don't have the history to understand how we got to where we are.
I do understand ...
|
|
|
