Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:27 +0100 (BST)
In article <7kdvu9F39jpe0U1@mid.individual.net>, kat.news@ntlworld.com
(kat) wrote:
> I was called a fuckwit when I first arrived. I was somewhat
> shocked that discussion could degenerate like that in what I
> thought was a group for serious business. But I got over it and it
> did achieve something. It ...
|
Re: Question for candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:27 +0100 (BST)
In article <1j82095.6h3im313ubht2N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>,
%steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> If only there were a decent fish and chip shop within miles of
> here. The last good one that I knew of was at Milford near Godalming
> but it was bulldozed to make way for something else. Chippies around
> h ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:27 +0100 (BST)
In article <7kdv5dF38j8bpU1@mid.individual.net>, kat.news@ntlworld.com
(kat) wrote:
>
> I ought to mention, I never found you an /annoying/ fuckwit.
Hmmm - did someone misspell irritating? :-)
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
...
|
Re: Question for candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:27 +0100 (BST)
In article <0314e5t17ml1b1257tbl72sa10h45g9l72@4ax.com>,
vicmeld@gmail.com (Victor Meldrew) wrote:
> uk.food+drink.chippies
Fast-track!
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
...
|
The University of Cambridge and urcm
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:25:53 +0000 (UTC)
I have recently tried to raise the question of responsibility for the
censored - oops, moderated - newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated. Nobody
has been forthcoming - what a surprise - so I have had to make further
enquiries.
Do you mind me asking their point of view? I feel sure the moderators have
made sure th ...
|
ulm Rejection 80815
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:25:27 +0100
This post appears in the history of having been rejected today
2009.10.23 15:00:23 80815
It does not appear in the list of rejected posts and the reason given.
Please could someone explain.
...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
23 Oct 2009 16:24:10 +0100 (BST)
In article <m7g3e5djevpbkq3m2hc821li9calnmp6ii@4ax.com>,
.m <nospam@notnominet.name> wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:08:16 +0100, "kat" <kat.news@ntlworld.com>
>wrote:
>>It didn't occur to me that anything was wrong until recently. I can see a
>>change that needs no RFD - all advice to proponents given by the C ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
23 Oct 2009 16:08:17 +0100 (BST)
In article <7kdrnhF3997lbU1@mid.individual.net>,
kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> said:
>> For example, at the moment we occasionally have a situation where
>> undocumented `best practices' are strongly suggested to proponents by
>> the committee. I would be happy ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:08:24 +0000 (UTC)
On 2009-10-22, Barry Salter <salterg@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Mark Goodge wrote:
>> Sorry. If you want to try again, I promise to be more obstructive next
>> time.
>
> Of course, the real fun would come if all of UKVoting (well...I *say*
> all, only Jon, Pedt and myself seem to be active at the moment)
> ...
|
Re: UK Usenet Committee Elections 2009 - Confirmed Candidates
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:22:43 +0100
In uk.net.news.management on 20 Oct 2009 15:34:31 +0100 (BST), Ian
Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> So we need to substantially reduce the effort and aggro required to
> create a newsgroup. A lot of that is down to subtle stuff like having
> a Committee with a supportive and flexible attitude. ...
|
