|
|
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:25:26 +0000
In uk.net.news.management, Simon Brooke <stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:42:16 +0000, Tony wrote:
>
>> In uk.net.news.management, Simon Brooke <stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:09:40 +0000, Tony wrote:
>>>
>>>> In uk.net.news.management, Simo ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:12:50 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:31:42 -0000,
kat <kat.news@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Tim Woodall <devnull@woodall.me.uk> said:
>
>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:05:31 +0000,
>> Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall put finger to
>>> keyboard and typ ...
|
Formal Complaint uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:26:45 +0000
This is a formal complaint to the chief moderator of the group
uk.rec.cycling.moderated.
I have emailed the moderators of uk.rec.cycling.moderated at the
address: uk-rec-cycling-moderated-request (at) usenet.org.uk.
The email failed.
I understand that this is a known problem.
I request a statement ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:05:31 +0000,
Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall put finger to
> keyboard and typed:
>
>>Of course, I cannot[1] email them and they don't publish an alternative
>>address.
>>
>>[1] Yes, I know I can if I reconf ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:11:41 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:38:56 +0000,
Tony <postmaster@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
> In uk.net.news.management, Tim Woodall <devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:50:22 +0000,
>> Tony <postmaster@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
>
>>> When did you alert the committee?
>
>>My first post to unnc (crossposted ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:51:41 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:58:16 +0000,
Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:26:16 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall put finger to
> keyboard and typed:
>
>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:01:59 +0000,
>> Just zis Guy, you know? <guy.chapman@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:50:22 +0000,
Tony <postmaster@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
> In uk.net.news.management, Tim Woodall <devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:01:59 +0000,
>> Just zis Guy, you know? <guy.chapman@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:52:59 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall
>> ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:31:47 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:11:33 +0000,
Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>
> There is only one official published address. It would be far simpler,
> for all concerned, to just make it work.
>
Does this apply to @usenet.org.uk as well?
uk-rec-cycling-moderated-request@usenet.org.uk reject ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:26:16 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:01:59 +0000,
Just zis Guy, you know? <guy.chapman@spamcop.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:52:59 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall
><devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>This is what really happens:
> [snip]
>>... 82.0.173.107 is listed in zen.spamhaus.org
>
>
> See http://www.spamhaus.org ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:24:07 +0000
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:11:08 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall put finger to
keyboard and typed:
>Assuming that the gradwell mailservers are working correctly, the only
>people who can tell if chiark is refusing mail sent via
>uk-rec-cycling-moderated-request (at) usenet.org.uk are people with
>access to the logs at gra ...
|
|
|
