|
|
|
What was that ex-cathedra announcement all about then?
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:41:27 +0000
It doesn't seem to be very evenly applied. Why am I not surprised?
See the sig in Message-ID: <Sjd*dOgVs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
--
Geoff Berrow (Put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker
...
|
Re: On moderated newsgroups
Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:28:33 +0000
At 23:51:00 on Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Paul Cummins
<usethebl@stedphone.invalid> wrote in
<memo.20091103235111.2152A@cix.co.uk>:
>In article <btl0f5pkksat8mragreobfm2b68j786gka@4ax.com>,
>nospam@notnominet.name (.m) wrote:
>
>> UKVoting, The Committee, the VT, Various MTAs, Bikeshedding, The
>> Committee, Obstruct ...
|
Re: Hustings question
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:50:27 +0000
In uk.net.news.management, Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> wrote:
>You assume
No, YOU assume.
--
Tony Evans
Saving trees and wasting electrons since 1993
blog -> http://perceptionistruth.com/
olmr -> http://www.onelinemoviereviews.co.uk/
[ anything below this line wasn't written by me ] ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
04 Nov 2009 16:33:15 +0000 (GMT)
Tony wrote:
>
>Had Ian just turned down spam checking on the single usenet.org.uk e-mail
>address there WOULD BE NO ISSUE.
To be honest I agree with this. But I do wonder how much spam we should
expect the moderators to have to deal with before it is considered a
problem and *some* sort of filtering is requi ...
|
Re: Hustings question
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:02:04 +0000
In <83tyxai8tx.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009
15:54:50 +0000, Owen Dunn <owend@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>Dick Gaughan <dg@dickgaughan.co.uk> writes:
>
>> I should have made it clearer that my comparison with my RL
>> experience was intended to be with the _method_ - i.e., the
>> canvassi ...
|
Re: Hustings question
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:17:03 +0000
In <7jmy328hjv.fsf@rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk> on 04 Nov 2009 14:57:11
+0000, Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> wrote:
>Dick Gaughan <dg@dickgaughan.co.uk> writes:
>
>> I should have made it clearer that my comparison with my RL
>> experience was intended to be with the _method_ - i.e., the
>> canvassing outside o ...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:06:48 +0000
Tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid> writes:
> It makes perfect sense to me that uk.* groups use @usenet.org.uk
> addresses,
Oh, I agree. However, since it's not written down anywhere that this
must be so, nobody is going to know it's obligatory. You can't
expect people to obey rules you've not told them about.
...
|
Re: Husting post -- Jonathan Amery
Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:13:03 +0000
Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> writes:
> On 03 Nov 2009 11:21:20 +0000 (GMT), Ian Jackson put finger to
> keyboard and typed:
>>
>>This kind of thing is one reason why it's unacceptable that you insist
>>on not publishing the moderators' official contact addresses as
>>defined by the moderators ...
|
Re: On moderated newsgroups
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:51 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <btl0f5pkksat8mragreobfm2b68j786gka@4ax.com>,
nospam@notnominet.name (.m) wrote:
> UKVoting, The Committee, the VT, Various MTAs, Bikeshedding, The
> Committee, Obstructionalism, Control, The Committee, Controls
> Systems,
> The committee...
>
> I've not seen ONE admission that you, "The Great Ja ...
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:20:58 +0000
In message <1j8lnrc.x6roe71clcw3wN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, Sn!pe
<snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>Tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid> wrote:
>> Usenet - the ham radio of the Internet.
>g8dgc (long since lapsed)
G1ZCC (ditto)
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home: <clive@davros.org>
Mobile: +44 7 ...
|
|
|
