|
|
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:08:17 -0500
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 03:29:34 -0700 (PDT),
Nuxx Bar <derderderder619@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 11:12?am, Andy Leighton <an...@azaal.plus.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:17:33 +0100,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?Tom Crispin <kije.rem...@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>> >
>> > It seems to me that a lot of di ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:01:05 -0500
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:22:33 +0100, jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:12:03 -0500, Andy Leighton
><andyl@azaal.plus.com> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> "Moderation will be used to ensure that the group remains civil,
>> pleasant and of interest to cyclists". I would also note that the
> ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 16:43:27 +0100
On 04 Jul 2009 15:17:19 GMT
Ian Smith <ian@astounding.org.uk> wrote:
> I have ALWAYS said sigs and body should be treated the same - they
> are both part of the post, they have both been caused by the poster.
> The spin you and others KEEP putting on it "but you now say" is a
> complete misrepresentation. M ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:42:06 -0500
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:29:59 +0100, jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
>
> It is very obvious that some of the things I am posting are being
> totally ignored by the proposed moderators.
>
> I have hence e-mailed them all with specific questions and asked that
> they provide their responses in this group.
...
|
Re: Proposed 3rd : RFD for uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:53:53 +0100
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:52:12 +0100, Phil W Lee
<phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
>James <james.annan@gmail.com> considered Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:47:23
>-0700 (PDT) the perfect time to write:
>
>>On Jul 4, 7:02?am, Ian Smith <i...@astounding.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I have said that sig and body should be ju ...
|
Re: Proposed uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:47:45 +0100
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:09:24 GMT, "Trevor A Panther"
<tapan@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>I shall not post again on this topic or on urc
as indeed - he had said earlier today:
>I said months ago that I would not post here again and this is intended to be a 1of intrusion.
and then
> I have no ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:38:53 +0100
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:05:24 +0100
Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> The fact is, you'll only find out the answers to these questions once
> the group is up and running. Don't forget that an over-draconian
> moderation policy will drive even good posters away, which I'm sure is
> not what they want. ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:31:36 +0100
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:51:02 +0100
Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> considered Sat, 4 Jul 2009 04:10:43
> +0100 the perfect time to write:
>
> >On 02 Jul 2009 20:29:16 +0100 (BST)
> >Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Everyone ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:25:33 +0100
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 04:30:39 +0100
"Clive George" <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> "Rob Morley" <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:20090704040552.3d485467@bluemoon...
> > On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:51:53 +0100
> > Dave J. <requiem@freeuk.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Don't you find the fervour with which tha ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:31:57 +0100
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:13:00 +0100, Phil W Lee
<phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
>%steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) considered Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:37:58
>+0100 the perfect time to write:
>
>>Phil W Lee <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
>>
>>> >Ho, ho, ho - why not scuttle off and find the quot ...
|
|
|
