|
|
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:54:01 +0100
Tom Crispin <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> writes:
> Danny has already said that he emailed three former subscribers to
> urc. Unless he says otherwise, he did so with an expectation that
> they would vote for the new group. I call that canvassing.
Notifying someone of the existence of a poll isn't ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:23:43 +0100
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:53:45 <rj9lb55pjjma6aq7noss2vvdrcc0l48dbj@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk>
>You are incredibly stupid.
If you say so it must be true.
>You implied that all the no voters, other than Tom, were non-cyclists.
Nope
>You have no evidence of that whatsoever.
...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:37:38 +0100
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:03:18 +0100, "Wm..the lying fuckwit."
<tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:42:30 <p1shb55mfb3lc16fturnlr63l17go826t9@4ax.com>
>uk.net.news.config Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid>
>
>>It's not IMHO. Just something to watch out for in the future.
>
> ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:59:05 +0100
On Tue, Sep 22 2009, Wm... wrote:
> Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:45:03
> <lvgib59kuvp3fgkvk47ha0s52bo06u8ncc@4ax.com> uk.net.news.config
> "Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chapman@spamcop.net>
>
>>I am sure all this is evil and sinister in some way that entirely
>>escapes me right now.
>
> It will all be in a novel by ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:33:46 +0100
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:03:18 +0100, "Wm..."
<tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:42:30 <p1shb55mfb3lc16fturnlr63l17go826t9@4ax.com>
>uk.net.news.config Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid>
>
>>It's not IMHO. Just something to watch out for in the future.
>
>We watch each oth ...
|
Re: Any news on the URCM vote yet?
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:06:45 +0100
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:20:36 +0100, .m <nospam@notnominet.name>
wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:28:53 +0100, Tom Crispin
><kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>
>>Is there a time limit on a result declaration after which the process
>>becomes null and void?
>
>No. Whatever the case, I do know Jon ...
|
Re: Any news on the URCM vote yet?
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:22:37 +0100
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:48:27 +0100, jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk>
wrote:
>I assume that the vote counter will resign.
You are free to assume whatever your little heart desires, but until
the full story is known, you're probably safer shutting the fuck up.
...
|
BEST BRANDS PORTAL
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
WWW.ADS-LOVE.BLOGSPOT.COM ...
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:50:30 +0100
Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:02:52 <9s8n85pur4aekpnrhrnsnj7djmin62osav@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk>
>On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:41:06 +0100, Owen Rees <orees@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Enough! The time has come to end this post,
>>But not before a little note of thanks
>>To he who volunte ...
|
Any news on the URCM vote yet?
Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:50:01 +0100
As subject, is the count still ongoing?
Ta
Alan.
--
To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. ...
|
|
|
