|
|
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:54:11 +0100
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:14:27 +0000 (UTC), Jon Ribbens
<jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
>On 2009-09-30, Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Later, when coded formats for sounds, pictures and compressed files
>> appeared, the term "binary" was extended to cover those. So now it means
>> esssenti ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
30 Sep 2009 09:52:39 +0100
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> The moderation system is now ready and waiting; Control has all the
> details necessary to create the group; the moderators have their
> passwords and are giving things a quick test to see everything looks
> good for them.
OOI, when should the new group' ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:09:42 +0100
In uk.net.news.config, "Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chapman@spamcop.net>
wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:32:59 +0100, "Anthony R. Gold"
><not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Back in the era of RFC977 I guess most people thought of plain text as
>>being 7 bit ASCII. But now, with regional character sets and t ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:14:44 +0100
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:04:11 GMT, "The Happy Hippy"
<the.happy.hippy.nntp@ntlworld.com> wrote in
<L3qvm.98548$OO7.85722@text.news.virginmedia.com>:
>The fact that there is a need for the media type is because it would
>otherwise be shown as plain text. The only reason plaintext HTML is turned
>into something ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:55:42 +0100
In article <RsjoAG0yjBvKFwb2@molly.mockford>, Molly Mockford <nospamnobo
dy@mollymockford.me.uk> writes
>No, it's been blown out of proportion by Wm... You can safely ignore
>his jibes - he has no more authority or status than anybody else around
>here, and less experience than many.
Never a truer word spo ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSE 128:24
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:44:42 +0200
.m wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:27:37 +0100, "Wm..."
> <tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
> >Perhaps cyclists and motorists get on better than some might think. I,
> >a cyclist, don't have a problem with motorists in general and presume
> >vice versa.
>
> Quite. I've nothing against cyclist ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:33:45 +0100
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:23:09 <jbdpb5lsfu27h4adb6up89b4rddfdiapel@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config . m <nospam@notnominet.name.invalid>
>On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:32:47 +0100, "Wm..."
><tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>My mother thought I looked a bit pale when she saw the pics from the
>>ride, however, she ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:32:47 +0100
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:54:09 <f81pb59dserdb9crdo3i795qcmmcltk4c3@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk>
TomC:
>>Keep up, Judith, if you can. We met fleetingly last Sunday.
>
>
>Was he "strange"?
Wearing jeans was probably a bad decision as I had to roll them up when
I got warm; I had m ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:12:18 +0100
At 19:10:00 on Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Tom Crispin
<kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote in
<3lcnb513itfi8ja4memvd32m2cv48nsjdb@4ax.com>:
>I knew that people had been canvassing past urc subscribers. I stated
>that I didn't think that it was wrong to do so. This has all been
>blown out of proportion, prob ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:48:00 +0100
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:08:08 <dbknb5d29kf0henc0v7d9o88sc8kru5ho8@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config . m <nospam@notnominet.name.invalid>
>On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:45:11 +0100, Tom Crispin
><kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>
>>If you have apologised, I have missed the apology.
>
>Wm... FFS just say sorry fo ...
|
|
|
