Re: RFD: delete newsgroup uk.comp.sys.palmtops
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:26:48 +0000
Tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid> considered Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:16:22
+0000 the perfect time to write:
>On 25/01/2010 20:58, Mark Goodge wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:52:16 +0000, Geoff Berrow put finger to
>> keyboard and typed:
>
>>> My daughter can text one handed without looking at the phone. With
>>> th ...
|
Re: RFD: delete newsgroup uk.comp.sys.palmtops
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:16:10 +0000
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:16:22 +0000, Tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid>
wrote:
>So, uk.comp.sys.mobile anyone?
I'd been wondering about that myself.
--
Geoff Berrow (Put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker
...
|
RFD: delete newsgroup uk.comp.certification
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:45:09 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the following changes
in the uk.* Usenet hierarchy:
delete newsgroup uk.comp.certification
Newsgroup lines:
uk.co ...
|
Re: The future of uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:12:46 +0000
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:15:17 -0000, "Clive George"
<clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
><crn@NOSPAM.netunix.com> wrote in message
>news:hj5mm0$86b$1@news.albasani.net...
>> In uk.net.news.config Adam Funk <a24061a@ducksburg.com> wrote:
>>> On 2010-01-19, Tom Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>> > Home many posters are there ...
|
Re: The future of uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:15 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <hinut6$i4h$2@news.eternal-september.org>,
rusty.hinge@foobar.girolle.co.uk (Rusty Hinge) wrote:
> One must presume that Mr. J is faily recently on the Usenet scene -
> to some users, nothing is 'obvious'.
He was a member of UKV until he got thrown out, about 10 years ago.
--
Paul Cummins - Al ...
|
Re: The future of uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:15 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <mq8vk5tpnkdcgj2o29riinq8ravceeqeis@4ax.com>,
vicmeld@gmail.com (Victor Meldrew) wrote:
> >And if it's not more useable by Easter, I'll be RFDing for it's
> removal.
>
> No you wont FOOL
I can assure you I will.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981 ...
|
Re: The future of uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:47:50 -0600
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:29 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
Paul Cummins <usethebl@stedphone.invalid> wrote:
> In article <wxl*Gy80s@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>,
> ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Ian Jackson) wrote:
>
>> It might be best to follow this up by private email:
>
> Why - this is a newsgr ...
|
Re: The future of uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:29 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <wxl*Gy80s@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>,
ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Ian Jackson) wrote:
> It might be best to follow this up by private email:
Why - this is a newsgroup for discussing newsgroups. I fully support
anything that makes URCM more useable.
And if it's not more useable by Easter, ...
|
Crossword answers
Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:01:58 +0000
For those who have been eagerly awaiting the crossword answers, they are
printed below.
For those who prefer seeing the solution as a grid, you can find it in
http://www.pedt.demon.co.uk/unnc/
Across Down
1. Molly Mockford 2. Loci
9. OE 3. Yo
10. Dice ...
|
FAST-TRACK of uk.net.providers.ntl-remove
Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:43:11 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
FAST TRACK ANNOUNCEMENT uk.net.providers.ntl-remove
=======================
In the procedures established for maintaining the uk.* hierarchy
<http://www.usenet.org.uk/guidelines.html> there are provisions, where
there is a consensus and the proposal is straightforward an ...
|
