Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:58:03 +0100
Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:46:12 <87d454o845.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk>
uk.net.news.config Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk>
>usenet.org.uk could just forward to moderators.isc.org, in the case of
>a uk.* group that for whatever reason didn't want to follow the petty
>insistence on going via usenet.org. ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
PASSES 128:24
Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
On 2009-10-03, Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>> I suggest you go read up on how moderated newsgroups work.
>
> That would be:
> http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/inn/docs/moderators.html
> which makes it clear that moderators.isc.org maintains the forwarding
> database for all newsgroups ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:27:44 +0100
In MsgID<20090930035322.7855a675@bluemoon> on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:53:22
+0100, in uk.net.news.config, 'Rob Morley' wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:32:59 +0100
>"Anthony R. Gold" <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Where I come, from plain text is just a sub-set of binary and not
>> something different.
>
>I ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
PASSES 128:24
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:48:00 +0100
On 2009-10-01, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> In <t997c591hp1vrul7klivcvp279b6lir0ij@4ax.com> jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> writes:
>
>>>When Control issues the newgrp. I wrote to them on Sunday morning
>>>confirming that the usenet.org.uk addresses they insist on routing all
>>>mail through (not a requirement in t ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
PASSES 128:24
Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
On 2009-10-01, jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
> uk-rec-cycling-moderated@moderators
> uk-rec-cycling-moderated-request@usenet
Points for being slightly amusing, but not subtlety. ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup
uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:08:09 +0000 (UTC)
On 2009-10-01, Anthony R. Gold <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wrote:
> Wow, I must have blinked while it happened. Who banned them and when, how
> and with what authority? Please be specific.
The Guidelines did, in 1997 or so.
Section 1 says:
"In any uk.* hierarchy or group whose charter does not mention
bi ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:50:38 +0100
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:20:35 +0000 (UTC), Jon Ribbens
<jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2009-10-01, Anthony R. Gold <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:52:29 +0100, Graham Drabble <usenet05@drabble.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> I think you're missing the main reason behind banning binaries ...
|
HTML Plain Text or Binaries
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:10:16 +0100
I have never see so much crap in all my life as has been generated in
another thread, as to what posts should or should not be allowed.
ffs - if this really is such a problem - why cannot the committee
between them decide some suitable wording and then say that that is
the default rule.
Here's a start: fo ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:43:50 +0100
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:08:43 +0000 (UTC), Jon Ribbens
<jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
>On 2009-10-01, Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:24:33 +0000 (UTC), Jon Ribbens
>><jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Very plain ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
PASSES 128:24
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:42:42 +0000 (UTC)
On 2009-09-30, David Damerell <damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> confirming that the usenet.org.uk addresses they insist on routing all
> mail through (not a requirement in the Guidelines, of course)
No, that's just a requirement if you want the moderation of the group
to actually *work*. ...
|
