Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:19:42 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:00:33 <op9375tpmeusjt4argu52dsqmd49s087sr@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk>
>On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:24:24 +0100, "Wm..."
><tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>
>>UKV counts votes. The committee instructs Control or the deputy to
>>create a ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:11:08 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:48:19 <a29375lo1tdjlou9emv0j3rd0ek2qr3ccc@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid>
>On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:55:22 +0100, "Wm..."
><tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:04:53 <r0s2759cbin8opvbhtckb8md03kjieh9pt@4ax.com>
>>uk.net.news ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:01:46 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:56:19 <526375habeolls2e4qf5pfs0l27mt7jmjo@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config Aard <aardvark@the.zoo>
>I think its time some complaints about procedure were made - this is
>yet another post from one of the would-be mods confirming that the
>result is precast.
I am not a potential mod for uk.rec.c ...
|
Re: Now I'm a real cyclist!
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 30, 10:55?am, Tony Raven <j...@raven-family.invalid> wrote:
> cc'd to unnc as this contravenes the rule against soliciting votes from
> disinterested parties, ignoring of which can lead to the offender's vote
> being rejected as invalid. ?I'm sure someone there will pick up on this
> if they are not already ...
|
more illegal canvassing by "Judith M Smith"
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
She's now canvassing in uk.legal.moderated against the creation
of uk.rec.cycling.moderated. The sig on the following messages
has appeared several times in the past day or two.
Perhaps she should be blacklisted from uk.legal.moderated (as
well as banned from voting in the CFV, of course) for this kind
of abus ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:02:30 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:33:34 <t71375hcesvqhl68u6dkl7htugh8ormfsl@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config Aard <aardvark@the.zoo>
>What an odious tosser you are!
notice the zoo? Get back where you belong (the phrase existed before
the cute mop tops, BTW)
I can't work out if our aardvark is colonel or colonial
Not imp ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:55:22 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:04:53 <r0s2759cbin8opvbhtckb8md03kjieh9pt@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid>
>What's the delay on processing votes now? I voted on Monday and I
>haven't received an acknowledgement yet.
batches, the vote taker is having to think a bit more than usual and ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:24:24 +0100
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:33:20 <slrnh72j60.fo5.andyl@azaal.plus.com>
uk.net.news.config Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com>
>I think that in such a case all they could do is consider the balance
>of the RFD commenters.
I'm not sure that would be necessary or sensible.
> Quite obviously, not everyone who votes ...
|
Re: Now I'm a real cyclist!
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:55:54 +0100
cc'd to unnc as this contravenes the rule against soliciting votes from
disinterested parties, ignoring of which can lead to the offender's vote
being rejected as invalid. I'm sure someone there will pick up on this
if they are not already aware.
Tony
In article <31m175li325m39vbjhuq930g0nt1m6gofh ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:40:03 +0200 (CEST)
jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:10:05 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
> <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> >Please be sure to disqualify votes from Judith and her sock puppets,
> >and check carefully for the puppets. She's probably been voting early
> >and voting often ...
|
