|
|
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
09 Oct 2009 12:57:07 +0100 (BST)
Quoting Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk>:
>On 08 Oct 2009 19:03:33 +0100 (BST), David Damerell put finger to
>>The committee is mandated to document the group creation process.
>No, it isn't.
http://www.usenet.org.uk/committee.html
"It will ensure that the rules for group creation are document ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
09 Oct 2009 12:55:43 +0100 (BST)
Quoting Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk>:
><damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>I'm impressed at the sheer amount of weaselling going on to suggest that a
>>piece of wording which is expected to be in every RFD should go nowhere
>>near the Guidelines, but at the end of the line, there's something to
>> ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
09 Oct 2009 11:17:34 +0100 (BST)
In article <crdsc5l4o6ni5oep64kj27pkm7fc5dr6i1@4ax.com>,
.m <nospam@notnominet.name> wrote:
>Look you fucking idiot, it's simple, and should even be understood by
>a complete twunt like you: The Committee offerede advice that enabled
>the RFD to be posted in a way that would cause less agrument.
This is co ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
Thu, 8 Oct 2009 19:40:31 +0100
At 19:03:33 on Thu, 8 Oct 2009, David Damerell
<damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in
<rKx*DP4Ss@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>:
>urcm - the only group creation activity for some time
You just weren't paying attention, were you?
--
Molly
I don't speak for the Committee. If I ever do, it will be made
...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
PASSES 128:24
Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:35:51 +0000 (UTC)
On 2009-10-08, Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> It seems I specified the wrong alias when asking moderators.isc.org to be
> set up, which may account for the delay. My apologies for that. Steps have
> been taken to fix it.
Looks like they've set it up now. ...
|
Re: RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderatedPASSES 128:24
08 Oct 2009 16:59:24 +0100 (BST)
Quoting Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk>:
><damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>If only there were some provision in the Guidelines for the case where "in
>>all but exceptional or unusual cases an RFD ought to follow this
>>guideline".
>Or is it Krusty?
God forbid you do the one thing you're actuall ...
|
Re: Any news on the URCM vote yet?
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
On 7 Oct, 20:59, Judith M Smith <judithmsm...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:00:21 -0700 (PDT), RudiL <rudilu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 7 Oct, 11:50, Judith M Smith <judithmsm...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:06:59 -0700 (PDT), RudiL <rudilu...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
...
|
Re: Any news on the URCM vote yet?
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
On 7 Oct, 11:50, Judith M Smith <judithmsm...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:06:59 -0700 (PDT), RudiL <rudilu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > I was caught out by an email
> >> >like this recently. It may be worth considering PGP authentication
>
> >> >Rudi
>
> >> Did you spill any beans? ...
|
Re: Any news on the URCM vote yet?
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
On 6 Oct, 20:26, Judith M Smith <judithmsm...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:39:05 -0700 (PDT), RudiL <rudilu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 6 Oct, 11:20, Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> >> In article <ibqkc512teeqnt4mnrvfnadgng70850...@4ax.com>,
> >> one of our tro ...
|
Re: Any news on the URCM vote yet?
Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:56:29 +0100
On 2009-10-06, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In article <ibqkc512teeqnt4mnrvfnadgng70850mmc@4ax.com>,
> one of our trolls wrote:
>>[more vacuous vitriol]
>
> I've been dutifully reading this group without the benefit of a
> killfile since being told that it was essential for a proponent, but I
> think the time has com ...
|
|
|
