|
|
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 11, 3:32?pm, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> Are the trolling posts with regard to speed cameras currently being made
> by "spindrift" in uk.rec.driving to be permitted in urcm? I ask since it
> seems just a tad hypocritical that the oh so delicate and upset cyclists
> who protest that they ne ...
|
Re: Censorship in uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Another forgery.
--
Guy ...
|
TLLCA
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:53:47 +0100
Just as an aside, who or what is TLLCA in the context of the uk.*
hierarchy? My Google-fu is weak today.
Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:57:45 +0100
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:41:11 <h3a4pn$9ip$1@news.datemas.de>
uk.net.news.config Dave J. <requiem@freeuk.com>
>I'd imagine that if you included skiing it would dwarf both those figures.
>Though, I don't know so ICB-v-W.
Judith will probably want to have sex with you soon if continue, DaveJ.
What you don't know i ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:56:41 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:57:15 +0100,
Dave J <requiem@freeuk.com> wrote:
>
> NO. Racist/homophobic/personally-abusive stuff is universally banned,
> being in a sig makes no difference. ISP AUPs ban it, server AUPs ban it,
> and moderation means that the moderators are responsible for it, so it HAS
> to be bann ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 11, 12:40?pm, "The Happy Hippy"
<the.happy.hippy.n...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> I note you said "might", but this is very dangerous ground. You are risking
> defining "trolling" as any activity which the group would take exception to,
> which can lead to the position that only subject matter which the group
...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:30:51 +0100
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:24:42 <cfmg55tb0ejh4a3d1a795autgaj1g2ljlm@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk>
>Well if our experience with the committee address is anything to go
>by, you are overstating the problem.
>
>Sure we get some spam, but I wouldn't say it was a major problem.
Do you ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
10 Jul 2009 12:20:13 +0100 (BST)
In article <S9qdndsSULJgvcrXnZ2dnUVZ8tWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
Clive George <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>I think it's been relevant - the public moderator's email address needs to
>be accessible to all, IanJ needs to do the appropriate configuration to
>allow that, and say that he has done so.
Personal ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:59:52 +0100,
Wm... <tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
> I may want to use a hotmail address, oh poo.
>
That shouldn't make any difference to you[1]. When you "post" to a
moderated group then the post goes to the newsserver (probably at your
ISP). That newserver then constru ...
|
Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
On 9 July, 20:16, "Wm..." <tcn...@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
> Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:51:09
> <f2cbf3b4-c916-4650-b4a1-57ae759d3...@k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
> uk.net.news.config Nuxx Bar <derderderder...@hotmail.com>
>
> >Besides, even if they weren't subject to moderation, they'd still be
> >unaccepta ...
|
|
|
