Re: moderation is not censorship
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:57:09 +0200
Nuxx Bar wrote:
>
> If I were a keen cyclist then I would *hate* that my hobby was being
So you admit that you have no interest in cycling?
You're at least as much of a cyclist-hater as you
accuse other people of being motorist-haters.
(And you never answered my question about the actual
means you claim ...
|
Re: 'purpose' clause in CFVs (was Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/)
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:05:06 -0500
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:21:29 +0100,
Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> (followups set to UNNM, which seems more appropriate)
>
> Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> writes (quoting a CFV):
>
>> "The purpose of this vote is to determine the genuine interest of
>> persons who would read th ...
|
Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:18:34 +0100
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:59:58
<b78d9ac4626eb16227682ea1d0245c3a@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
uk.rec.cycling N Ron Hubbard <me@privacy.net>
>jms wrote:
>>
>> A NO vote does not say that you will not "read" the group - it says
>> that you oppose its creation.
>>
>> There may (hopefully) be a number of people who ...
|
Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:59:58 +0200
jms wrote:
>
> A NO vote does not say that you will not "read" the group - it says
> that you oppose its creation.
>
> There may (hopefully) be a number of people who oppose the group (for
> whatever reason) who will vote against it.
>
> I may read it if it is created; but I will vote against it.
Why do ...
|
Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:16:59 +0100
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:58:29 <$xsqLze113ZKFwPp@user-unknown.mx2.org.uk>
uk.net.news.config Pedt <"\"@ @\""@user-unknown.mx2.org.uk>
>In message <aeme65hj5g4qsmot3nq010mnq7adnhn70p@4ax.com>, at 11:31:14 on
>Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Anthony R. Gold <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wibbled
>>On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:10:49 +0100, Ro ...
|
Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:44:10 +0100
At 21:58:29 on Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Pedt <"\"@
@\""@user-unknown.mx2.org.uk> wrote in
<$xsqLze113ZKFwPp@user-unknown.mx2.org.uk>:
>In message <aeme65hj5g4qsmot3nq010mnq7adnhn70p@4ax.com>, at 11:31:14 on
>Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Anthony R. Gold <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wibbled
>>On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:10:49 +0100, Ro ...
|
Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:58:29 +0100
In message <aeme65hj5g4qsmot3nq010mnq7adnhn70p@4ax.com>, at 11:31:14 on
Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Anthony R. Gold <not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wibbled
>On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:10:49 +0100, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> Soliciting votes from disinterested parties defeats this purpose.
>
>The sense of that stat ...
|
Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:10:49 +0100
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:42:02 +0100
Tom Crispin <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:04:58 +0200, N Ron Hubbard <me@privacy.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Isn't there a rule against canvassing during a
> >CFV? Can some action be taken for this?
>
> What an absurd idea!
"The pur ...
|
Re: http://www.mybikelane.com/
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:04:58 +0200
Judith M Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:34:34 +0100, Tom Crispin
> <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>
> >Name and shame those drivers who park inconsiderately blocking cycle
> >paths.
> >
> >http://www.mybikelane.com/
>
>
> Make you mind up - do you want cycle lanes/paths for cyclist ...
|
Re: FAST-TRACK of uk.net.providers.gradwell
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:44:30 +0100
Graham Drabble <usenet05@drabble.me.uk> wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2009 Chris Croughton <chris@keristor.net> wrote in
> news:7ck1s2F280qd1U1@mid.individual.net:
>
>> NIN do not currently allow me (or, as far as I know, any other
>> 'user') to post Control messages. It is something I will be
>> investigating, because ...
|
