|
|
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:30:26 +0100
Response to Roger Thorpe:
> > Jesus wept, what's so hard to understand here? If he's a pauper,
> > there's fuck all to gain by Guy suing him is there? And if he's a
> > pauper, there's _everything_ to gain for him in suing Damerall.
>
> Oh, I'd accept that point, especially with your 'IF'. I probably
> dro ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:29:52 +0100
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:48:17 +0100, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:24:52 +0100
>"Clive George" <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Not sure whether you're intentionally as funny as you are. If you
>> want to be menacing, you've got to have some credibility, and right
>> now ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:49:42 +0100
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:14:28 +0100
Aard <aardvark@the.zoo> wrote:
> TRANSLATION "Okay, I can't come up with anything that goes against
> what you've said above".
>
My sister-in-law is purple with green spots and eats worms.
...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:27:44 +0100
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:16:06 +0100, Aard <aardvark@the.zoo> wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:32:46 +0100, Marc
><initial.surname@btintenret.com> wrote:
>
>>jms wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:28:11 +0100, Aard <aardvark@the.zoo> wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Okay, happy now?
>>>
>>>
>>> Forget ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:27:00 +0100
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:31:45 -0500, Andy Leighton
<andyl@azaal.plus.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:00:26 +0100,
> Maurice <MAURICE@theoldpost.plus.com> wrote:
>> I've been following this debate on 'Cycling' and it variants (or should that
>> be deviants?) since the its initiation.
>>
>> It's ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:08:30 +0100
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:25:16 +0100, "Wm..."
<tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:50:46 <slrnh6p2b6.ar6.andyl@azaal.plus.com>
>uk.net.news.config Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com>
>
>>This is the Margaret that you said wasn't you and was in fact someone
>>trying to blacken your n ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:12:04 +0100
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:30:06
<x-ydnfWmZfAtPfHXnZ2dnUVZ8nOdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> uk.net.news.config
Maurice <MAURICE@theoldpost.plus.com>
>Is there a process to remove the CFV on the ground of unlikely success in
>the actual organisation and running of the proposed new group given the
>current level of animosity ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:09:04 +0100
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:50:46 -0500, Andy Leighton
<andyl@azaal.plus.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:05:00 +0100, jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:55:55 -0700, "Anthony R. Gold"
>><not-for-mail@ahjg.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Tim Woodall
>> ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:38:12 +0100
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:33:38 <nm4p65pvapd3qo9l15i75k7n6272bla1iq@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.config "Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chapman@spamcop.net>
>but now we have
>Margaret in the equation and I don't even know who Margaret is. I
>might have to conquer my apathy enough to find out who she is.
I'm going to guess ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:04:48 +0100
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:00:26 +0100, "Maurice"
<MAURICE@theoldpost.plus.com> wrote:
>Please guys if any of you do want this new group to succeed sort out your
>differences and move on peaceably.
I'd be interested to see how you'd sort out differences with people
whose differences begin with the planet they li ...
|
|
|
