|
|
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:47:20 +0100
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:19:22 <20090804071922.33936e4f@bluemoon>
uk.net.news.config Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com>
>On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 02:03:22 +0100
>Molly Mockford <nospamnobody@mollymockford.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> Wm... is correct. The verb "to be" takes the nominative.
>>
>Apparently it's been disputed since t ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:19:22 +0100
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 02:03:22 +0100
Molly Mockford <nospamnobody@mollymockford.me.uk> wrote:
> Wm... is correct. The verb "to be" takes the nominative.
>
Apparently it's been disputed since the 18th century, with Priestley[1]
coming out in favour of the "wrong" form that I also prefer. I think
I'll stick with ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 02:03:22 +0100
At 23:59:21 on Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote
in <20090803235921.0ec5d704@bluemoon>:
>On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:25:31 +0100
>"Wm..." <tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:56:50 <20090803135650.0f139256@bluemoon>
>> uk.net.news.config Rob Morley <nospam@ntlwor ...
|
Open question to Ian Jackson re URCM
Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:02:39 +0100
The initial policy of URCM says :
The moderators can be reached at
urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Will this address accept emails and deliver them to the moderators
when those emails originate from "hotmail" and "live" accounts.
Are there any types of account from where you envisage peopl ...
|
UKVoting Statement - Ian Jackson : Complaint
Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:41:59 +0100
See message below from 2000 from uk.voting.org
Is this the same Ian Jackson who has proposed the moderated cycling
group, chosen the moderators, and who will be the chief moderator?
(Oh - and whose system - chiark - (on which the moderation system will
be run) cannot accept messages from Microsoft systems (eg ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 02 Aug 2009 07:24:35 -0500
On 2009-08-02, Simon Brooke <stillyet@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 2 Aug, 01:57, Dave J. <requ...@freeuk.com> wrote:
>> If pushed I would own up to it being, in theory, another dictatorship.
>
> It isn't really, because Control (as you indicate) doesn't have any
> power /except/ insofar as he is trusted by people ...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
On 2 Aug, 01:57, Dave J. <requ...@freeuk.com> wrote:
>
> If pushed I would own up to it being, in theory, another dictatorship.
It isn't really, because Control (as you indicate) doesn't have any
power /except/ insofar as he is trusted by people who do have power;
his directions are followed by them because the ...
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
On 1 Aug, 15:20, Toom Tabard <t...@tabard.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> On 1 Aug, 13:18, Marc <initial.surn...@btintenret.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Tom Crispin wrote:
>
> > > I used the spelling the insulter used. ?I was going to qualify the
> > > spelling with *sic* but when I checked, both *paedophile* and
> ...
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
On 1 Aug, 13:18, Marc <initial.surn...@btintenret.com> wrote:
> Tom Crispin wrote:
>
> > I used the spelling the insulter used. ?I was going to qualify the
> > spelling with *sic* but when I checked, both *paedophile* and
> > *pedophile* have the same meaning.
>
> Only if you are a Merkin or a moron!
>
> OED
...
|
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:13:32 +0100
In message <g03875148sdmn91l2a5niai8vk87t0j6hp@4ax.com>, at 10:34:28 on
Sat, 1 Aug 2009, "Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chapman@spamcop.net>
wibbled
>On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:37:12 +0100, Pedt <"\"@
>@\""@user-unknown.mx2.org.uk> wrote:
>
>>Can't be swine flu[1] as I've not come out in rashers.
>
>There's an oi ...
|
|
|
