Derren Brown studio (ducks head down)
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
I will not waste anyones time asking for a discussion of how the trick
was pulled, (but pity the poor PA who couldn't push a ball down) but
simply ask if anyone recognised the studio?
It looked to be almost Ealing vintage but knowing that studio complex
well can say that I don't think that it was recorded there. ...
|
Re: Netiquette (was Re: patronising digital advert)
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:21:58 +0100
In message <Yy0djoou4CrKFwrP@soft255.demon.co.uk>, "J. P. Gilliver
(John)" <G6JPG@soft255.demon.co.uk> writes
>. I fear that I shall continue to interleave - but with, I hope,
>judicious snipping. ..
Bravo. Interleaving and snipping are skills that seem to be
disappearing.
Please don't take this amiss b ...
|
Proms last night
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:18:58 +0100
I thought the BBC 1 coverage was quite reasonable and saw no spoiling
defects in picture quality, I did feel like a receding galaxy a few times
when the ceiling camera was pulling back from a long zoom.
...
|
Re: Netiquette (was Re: patronising digital advert)
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Howdy John, and to get the love fest out of the way at the beginning,
I have allways liked your posts, often learned something, and forget
that you are not blind as your insight and understanding of VI comp
related issues surpasses that of many blind users/maybe we should make
you an honorary blind-guy. Trust me, ...
|
Re: Netiquette (was Re: patronising digital advert)
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Howdy John, and to get the love fest out of the way at the beginning,
I have allways liked your posts, often learned something, and forget
that you are not blind as your insight and understanding of VI comp
related issues surpasses that of many blind users/maybe we should make
you an honorary blind-guy. Trust me, ...
|
BBC 1 picture quality
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:05:59 +0100
Watching 'Watchdog' on BBC 1. Is it me, or is there very bad
strobing of the studio picture everytime the camera moves or
twitches?
The pre-recorded segments are OK.
Nick.
...
|
Re: Netiquette (was Re: patronising digital advert)
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:17:20 +0100
In message <8rt6a5lf9go0eorugodiiihan4o671bstb@4ax.com>, Ken
<ken_3@telia.com> writes:
>On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:44:36 +0100, Mark Carver
><mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
>>
>> > . I noticed someone else asked about this one, but anyway: there _is_ a
>> > technical reason ...
|
Wrekin TX upgrade
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.shropshirestar.com/2009/09/04/wrekin-transmitter-works-in-pictures/
Only it didn't quite go according to plan due to the wet and windy
weather, thus BBC2
http://www.shropshirestar.com/2009/09/03/tv-blackout-hits-county/
"Televisions across Shropshire were blacked out today as a major
airborne ope ...
|
Re: patronising digital advert
Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:25:32 +0100
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:28:12 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
wrote:
>
> In article <5095b75e6adave@davenoise.co.uk>, Dave Plowman (News)
> <dave@davenoise.co.uk> scribeth thus
> >
> > But I find
> > difficultly following a conversation in a noisy pub etc so my brain is
> > failing instead. ;-)
> >
> Com ...
|
Re: patronising digital advert
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:59:09 +0100
This advice applies even more forcibly to yourself.
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:17:44 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Go and find something real to worry about.
======================================
Please always reply to news group as the email address in
this post's header d ...
|
