|
|
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:16:28 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 1, 3:40???pm, Richard Evans <rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
> alexander.keys1 wrote:
>
> ???>
> ???> DAB is a great improvement over FM, for the average listener, for a
> ???> start there is a greater choice of stations, I recommend BBC Radio 7,
> ???> BBC World Service and Premier Christian Radio ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:15:27 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 1, 2:02???pm, "alexander.keys1" <alexander.ke...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On 1 Jan, 04:37, "IanT" <noem...@email.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > The type of people that say HD is far better are the type that claim DAB
> > sounds better than FM stereo. ???What they really mean is that they never
> > ever connected a p ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:47:38 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 2, 6:14?pm, charles <char...@charleshope.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> If you want big speakers, buy separates eg a DAB tuner.
I think there is a reason why people don't usually buy good speakers
to listen to DAB, and why people don't usually buy DAB hi-fi tuners.
These sort of things are usually bought by ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:23:23 +0000
In article <344ae5b5-13c0-4a03-8cec-425e7c6d41c2@r24g2000yqd.googlegroup
s.com>, alexander.keys1@googlemail.com <alexander.keys1@googlemail.com>
scribeth thus
>On 1 Jan, 20:40, Richard Evans <rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>> alexander.keys1 wrote:
>>
>> ?>
>> ?> DAB is a great improvement over FM, for t ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:54:13 +0000
In message
<344ae5b5-13c0-4a03-8cec-425e7c6d41c2@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
"alexander.keys1@googlemail.com" <alexander.keys1@googlemail.com> writes
>
>
>However a lot of people listen to FM on the cheap & nasty portables
>that are around now, in workplaces with bad reception and
>interference, also a l ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 10:30:53 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 2, 5:21?pm, "alexander.ke...@googlemail.com"
> yakking) stations distort and over-compress the audio, and probably
> over-modulate the transmitter, at least they can't do that with DAB.
No they are not allowed to over modulate an FM transmitter, as far as
I'm aware it's compulsory to use limiters.
Obvi ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:07:23 +0000
In message <4b3e70f9$0$8236$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se>, Richard
Evans <rp.evans.nospam@tiscali.co.uk> writes:
[]
>>> DAB is a great improvement over FM, for the average listener,
>> I suppose that if the average listener is a brain dead moron that
>>could be true.
>
>Unfortunately, you might find that t ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:14:05 +0000 (GMT)
In article <c3BWbsJzm4PLFwuV@soft255.demon.co.uk>,
J. P. Gilliver (John) <G6JPG@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In message
> <344ae5b5-13c0-4a03-8cec-425e7c6d41c2@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> "alexander.keys1@googlemail.com" <alexander.keys1@googlemail.com>
> writes:
> []
> >However a lot of people list ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:00:19 +0000
In message
<344ae5b5-13c0-4a03-8cec-425e7c6d41c2@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
"alexander.keys1@googlemail.com" <alexander.keys1@googlemail.com>
writes:
[]
>However a lot of people listen to FM on the cheap & nasty portables
And DAB; I don't think I've seen - certainly, there don't seem to be
many - DAB ...
|
Re: Anything positive to say about BBC HD quality.
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 09:21:02 -0800 (PST)
On 1 Jan, 20:40, Richard Evans <rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> alexander.keys1 wrote:
>
> ?>
> ?> DAB is a great improvement over FM, for the average listener, for a
> ?> start there is a greater choice of stations, I recommend BBC Radio 7> ?> BBC World Service and Premier Christian Radio,
>
> Interest ...
|
|
|
