Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:56:18 GMT
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 19:08:24, Fred J. McCall <fmccall@earthlink.net>
wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>:
>:The cost of a civil action would have been trivial for people with the
>:Blairs' income and assets. RH
>:
>You persist in missing the point. Gi ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:56:18 GMT
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 16:52:38, conwaycaine <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net>
wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>
>"Paul Hyett" <pah@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>news:u+fCl+bzkttIFwkJ@blueyonder.co.uk...
>> spying on you, it is unlikely you'd be aware of it.
><Snip>
>
>> Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
>
>Should t ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:56:18 GMT
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 19:26:01, Robert Henderson
<philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>In message <u+fCl+bzkttIFwkJ@blueyonder.co.uk>, Paul Hyett
><pah@invalid.invalid> writes
>>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 11:04:51, Robert Henderson
>><philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.e ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:56:18 GMT
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 19:25:38, Robert Henderson
<philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>>>
>>>The cost of a civil action would have been trivial for people with
>>>the Blairs' income and assets. RH
>>
>>Probably true, but they probably decided it just too trivial to be
>>worth bothe ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:52:58 +0100
In message <u+fCl+bzkttIFwkJ@blueyonder.co.uk>, Paul Hyett
<pah@invalid.invalid> writes
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 11:04:51, Robert Henderson
><philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>
>>If that was the case they would not have tried to get a criminal case
>>- which would have involved th ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:26:01 +0100
In message <u+fCl+bzkttIFwkJ@blueyonder.co.uk>, Paul Hyett
<pah@invalid.invalid> writes
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 11:04:51, Robert Henderson
><philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>
>>If that was the case they would not have tried to get a criminal case
>>- which would have involved th ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:25:38 +0100
In message <VPhcJZcImttIFwhh@blueyonder.co.uk>, Paul Hyett
<pah@invalid.invalid> writes
>>>>ved them far more - sustained against me.
>>>
>>>WHy not? Criminal case costs them nothing. A civil case they'd have
>>>to pay out of their own pocket with little chance of recovering
>>>expenses from you as you've bee ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:10:53 GMT
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 15:16:30, Robert Henderson
<philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>In message <Xns9B088731B1683souphotmailcom@62.141.42.83>, soupdragon
><me@privacy.com> writes
>>>>:Scotch brains1 They were willing to get involved with a criminal case
>>>>:but not a civil actio ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:10:53 GMT
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 at 11:04:51, Robert Henderson
<philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.politics.electoral :
>If that was the case they would not have tried to get a criminal case
>- which would have involved them far more - sustained against me.
>
>They also then used Special Branch and MI5 to spy on m ...
|
Re: by-election in Fife imminent
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:16:30 +0100
In message <Xns9B088731B1683souphotmailcom@62.141.42.83>, soupdragon
<me@privacy.com> writes
>>>:Scotch brains1 They were willing to get involved with a criminal case
>>>:but not a civil action with its lower standard of proof. RH
>>>:
>>>
>>>Perhaps they felt that you just didn't have anything worth the bothe ...
|
