Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:47:28 -0800 (PST)
On 16 Nov, 07:50, rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> The number of Lib Dems would be barely affected. Labour and Tories lose
> as many deposits as Lib Dems these days.
I was thinking more in terms of the difficulty of arranging the number
of nomination signatures (and possibly raising the money f ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:12:03 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 15, 8:09 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
wrote:
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>You said (earlier):
> >>>>"Your argument treats all laws as being the same."
> >>>>You said that as thoug ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article
<f00360d7-3d33-4786-beea-89649ae403fd@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
john.loony@tiscali.co.uk (JohnLoony) wrote:
> Conversely, Parliamentary elections require 10 signatures and a
> deposit of ¡ê500, which is about right because it produces a reasonable
> number of candidates (about 4 to 8 per constitu ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:34 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <5q1t9fFtst2dU1@mid.individual.net>,
T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
> James Farrar wrote:
>
> >>Of course making it legit to not use all the preferences does
> >>rather clash with the basic principle of compulsory voting - that
> >>all voters must cast a valid vote.
> ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:37:07 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 14, 5:36 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
wrote:
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > On Nov 14, 12:03 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
>
> >>>JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>
> >> ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:32 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <memo.20071114215837.3040g@a01-09-5548.rosenstiel.co.uk>,
rosenstiel@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> In article <1195060540.109713.68620@v65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> usenet@bondegezou.demon.co.uk () wrote:
>
> > rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> > > use...@bondegezou.demon. ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:27:48 -0800
On Nov 14, 7:15 pm, "use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk"
<use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> > use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > > There is no need for the compulsory use of all preferences, and it
> > > acts to dissuade people from casting preferences other ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:15:40 -0800
rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > There is no need for the compulsory use of all preferences, and it
> > acts to dissuade people from casting preferences other than as
> > recommended by the parties. The effect is to turn the voting method
> > into something ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:12:59 -0800
On Nov 14, 12:03 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
wrote:
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
> >>use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >>>JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
> >>>>use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wr ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:56 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <wOmdnc_924QjQ6fanZ2dnUVZ8s2mnZ2d@pipex.net>,
not.telling@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
> Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
>
> > not.telling@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
>
> >>>Quite a lot of million pound homes in and round Cambridge. Band H
> >>>at most, paying 3 times what s ...
|
