Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:21:25 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 16, 5:10 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
wrote:
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
> >>use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >>>JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
> >>[ ... ]
> >>>>>>You said (earlier) ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:18:38 -0800 (PST)
On 19 Nov, 10:39, "use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk"
<use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Why is the decision of the courts not an objective, value-judgement-
> free method?
Because the purpose of the courts is to uphold and entrench the pwer
and privileges of the ruling class, i.e. the imperialist bourgeois ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:39:38 -0800 (PST)
JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote [...]
> > I've done just that repeatedly in previous posts. I suggest you go
> > read them again.
>
> I've read them all. All you do is make veiled hints to the effect that
> illibrul laws can be ignored but laws supporte ...
|
Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 15th November 2007
Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:52 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <wsOdnbAhI_kOiaPanZ2dnUVZ8qrinZ2d@pipex.net>,
not.telling@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
> Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
>
> > Lincolnshire CC, Heighington and Washingborough
> > Con 877 (61.8;+14.5), Lab 206 (14.5;-26.9), LD 137 (9.7;+9.7),
> > BNP 126 (8.9;+8.9), UKIP 52 (3.7;-7.6), Ind 21 ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:47:28 -0800 (PST)
On 16 Nov, 07:50, rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> The number of Lib Dems would be barely affected. Labour and Tories lose
> as many deposits as Lib Dems these days.
I was thinking more in terms of the difficulty of arranging the number
of nomination signatures (and possibly raising the money f ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:12:03 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 15, 8:09 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
wrote:
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>You said (earlier):
> >>>>"Your argument treats all laws as being the same."
> >>>>You said that as thoug ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article
<f00360d7-3d33-4786-beea-89649ae403fd@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
john.loony@tiscali.co.uk (JohnLoony) wrote:
> Conversely, Parliamentary elections require 10 signatures and a
> deposit of ¡ê500, which is about right because it produces a reasonable
> number of candidates (about 4 to 8 per constitu ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:34 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <5q1t9fFtst2dU1@mid.individual.net>,
T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
> James Farrar wrote:
>
> >>Of course making it legit to not use all the preferences does
> >>rather clash with the basic principle of compulsory voting - that
> >>all voters must cast a valid vote.
> ...
|
Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:37:07 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 14, 5:36 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
wrote:
> use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > On Nov 14, 12:03 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote:
>
> >>>JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>
> >> ...
|
Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:32 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <memo.20071114215837.3040g@a01-09-5548.rosenstiel.co.uk>,
rosenstiel@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> In article <1195060540.109713.68620@v65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> usenet@bondegezou.demon.co.uk () wrote:
>
> > rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
> > > use...@bondegezou.demon. ...
|