Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
group : uk.politics.electoral      view archive
page nr. << back    20      21      22      23      24      25      26      27      28      29      30      31      32      33      34      35      36      37      38      39      40    next >>



Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law     Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:21:25 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 16, 5:10 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote: > > JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > >>use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote: > >>>JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > >>[ ... ] > >>>>>>You said (earlier) ...

Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law     Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:18:38 -0800 (PST)
On 19 Nov, 10:39, "use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk" <use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Why is the decision of the courts not an objective, value-judgement- > free method? Because the purpose of the courts is to uphold and entrench the pwer and privileges of the ruling class, i.e. the imperialist bourgeois ...

Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law     Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:39:38 -0800 (PST)
JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote > use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote [...] > > I've done just that repeatedly in previous posts. I suggest you go > > read them again. > > I've read them all. All you do is make veiled hints to the effect that > illibrul laws can be ignored but laws supporte ...

Re: Local Authority Byelection Results: Thursday 15th November 2007     Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:52 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <wsOdnbAhI_kOiaPanZ2dnUVZ8qrinZ2d@pipex.net>, not.telling@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote: > Colin Rosenstiel wrote: > > > Lincolnshire CC, Heighington and Washingborough > > Con 877 (61.8;+14.5), Lab 206 (14.5;-26.9), LD 137 (9.7;+9.7), > > BNP 126 (8.9;+8.9), UKIP 52 (3.7;-7.6), Ind 21 ...

Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?     Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:47:28 -0800 (PST)
On 16 Nov, 07:50, rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: > The number of Lib Dems would be barely affected. Labour and Tories lose > as many deposits as Lib Dems these days. I was thinking more in terms of the difficulty of arranging the number of nomination signatures (and possibly raising the money f ...

Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law     Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:12:03 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 15, 8:09 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote: > > JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > > > > >>>>You said (earlier): > >>>>"Your argument treats all laws as being the same." > >>>>You said that as thoug ...

Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?     Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <f00360d7-3d33-4786-beea-89649ae403fd@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, john.loony@tiscali.co.uk (JohnLoony) wrote: > Conversely, Parliamentary elections require 10 signatures and a > deposit of ¡ê500, which is about right because it produces a reasonable > number of candidates (about 4 to 8 per constitu ...

Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?     Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:34 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <5q1t9fFtst2dU1@mid.individual.net>, T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote: > James Farrar wrote: > > >>Of course making it legit to not use all the preferences does > >>rather clash with the basic principle of compulsory voting - that > >>all voters must cast a valid vote. > ...

Re: Clegg Vows to Defy ID Cards Law     Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:37:07 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 14, 5:36 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote: > > On Nov 14, 12:03 pm, JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> > > wrote: > > >>use...@bondegezou.demon.co.uk wrote: > > >>>JNugent <not.tell...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote: > > >> ...

Re: So what's the ideal number of candidates for an STV ballot?     Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:32 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
In article <memo.20071114215837.3040g@a01-09-5548.rosenstiel.co.uk>, rosenstiel@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: > In article <1195060540.109713.68620@v65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, > usenet@bondegezou.demon.co.uk () wrote: > > > rosenst...@cix.co.uk (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: > > > use...@bondegezou.demon. ...


page nr.: page nr. << back    20      21      22      23      24      25      26      27      28      29      30      31      32      33      34      35      36      37      38      39      40    next >>
Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us