Re: We should all be at Heathrow protesting
Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:59:24 -0000
On 31 Aug, 23:36, kinsl...@delillo.lsr.ph.ic.ac.uk wrote:
> (2) Of course climate models are imperfect: nevertheless, they are
> validated to the extent possible against available data, and are being
> actively improved.
Neither of those statements is incompatible with the models not being
any good at predictin ...
|
OT : FA - Scott Comp Alloy Mountain Bike
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:53:58 GMT
Item Number 170142207832
Scott Comp Aluminium Frame.
A well used and maintained mountain bike.
A bit tatty now with a few paint flakes.
Good specs with some expensive bits attached.
22" from bottom bracket to top of seat tube.
Deore LX F & R Deraileures (sp?) ;-)
New XT Cranks and new front chainr ...
|
Re: We should all be at Heathrow protesting
Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:01:24 +0100
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:33:03 GMT, "Alan Holmes"
<alan_holmes@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> That simply does not sanity check. It would mean an increase
>> in emission of 15 times. So 15 times as many aircraft would
>> have to be flying (into the UK). Just where are all these planes
>> going to land?
>
>Hopefull ...
|
Re: MI5 Persecution: Chris Tarrant - 10/March/1999 (6857)
Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:26:15 -0400
What the F@&*K is this guy about.
He is on a whole bunch of groups that I subscribe to.
No one seems to know what space ship he got off.
I tried reading some of this shit (Im on night shift) but I cant see what he
is about.
MI 5 ( British secret service) wannabe ?
I love a good mystery
<MI5Victim@mi5.gov ...
|
Re: We should all be at Heathrow protesting
Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:38:29 +0100
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:14:26 +0100 someone who may be " cupra"
<NOcupra.sSPAM@gmail.com> wrote this:-
>So why were climate protestors picketing a Nuclear Power station yesterday?
If greenhouse gas emissions were the only consideration then there
would probably be a case for nuclear electricity generation.
H ...
|
Re: We should all be at Heathrow protesting
Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:36:45 +0100
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:25:27 +0100 someone who may be "tim....."
<tims_new_home@yahoo.co.uk> wrote this:-
>> To expand on my earlier posting, as it says at
>> http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article2878762.ece
>>
>> "Aviation at present accounts for 7 per cent of Britain's carbon
>> emissions ...
|
Re: MI5 Persecution: Striking out action 10/3/97 (11749)
Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:58:10 -0700
MI5Vic...@mi5.gov.uk wrote:
:
>
>
> A couple of weeks ago I issued a summons against the BBC in my local county
> court, for the tort of private nuisance caused by the spying by their
> newsreaders on my home. My argument was that their spying had prevented me
> watching the news at home, and therefore interf ...
|
Re: MI5 Persecution: alt.fan.mike-corley 6/6/96 (3188)
20 Aug 2007 20:19:17 GMT
STOP SPAMMING BALDSPOT YOU FUCKING ASSHOLES!!
MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk wrote:
> From: richard@musicians-net.co.uk (Richard Fairhurst)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
> Subject: A Mike Corley newsgroup?
> Date: Thu Jun 6 05:02:17 1996
>
> In article <2520@osiris.win-uk.net>, burridge@osiris ...
|
Re: Heathrow: Bosses want to make proposed new runway even longer ...
Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:38:10 +0100
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:16:26 GMT, "Alan Holmes"
<alan_holmes@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> > So where is "here", which planes allegedly fly over "one every minute
>>> > all
>>> > day, every day"? I doubt if WebTrak would confirm that claim.
>>> > (WebTrak
>>> > is a replay of aircraft radar tracks, available 24 ...
|
Re: Heathrow: Bosses want to make proposed new runway even longer
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:44 +0100 (BST)
In article <FIlwi.30728$1G1.23875@newsfe2-win.ntli.net>,
never.opened@all.com (NM) wrote:
> I have actually both landed and taken off on the current 3rd
> existing runway when I was a kid in the air scouts.
This is Runway 5, of course.
Heathrow was designed as 3 pairs of twin runways, the current two, a pa ...
|
