|
|
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
On 9 Jul, 17:12, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On 8 Jul, 18:23, Naked Gonad <bodro...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
>
> >>> Naked Gonad wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu>
> ...
|
joke
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:36:26 +0100
A 7 year old boy and his 4 year old brother are upstairs in their bedroom.
>
> 'You know what?', says the 7 year old, 'I think it's about time we started
> swearing.'
>
> The 4 year old nods his head in approval.
>
> 'When we go downstairs for breakfast I'm going to swear first, then you
> swear after me, OK?' ...
|
Car Park terrorists
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:48:55 +0100
As west Sussex has no NG of its own and the local papers have been asked not
to mention it I thought I'd let you know about West Sussex County Council
I contacted the Council as they were specifically named for using the newly
brought in anti-terror laws to combat the threat of dirty nuclear bombs or
biologic ...
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 04:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Naked Gonad wrote:
> On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
> > Naked Gonad wrote:
> > > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu> wrote:
> > >> "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote in message
> >
> > >>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
> >
> > ...
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 01:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
On 8 Jul, 18:23, Naked Gonad <bodro...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Naked Gonad wrote:
> > > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu> wrote:
> > >> "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>
> > >>news:d_sck.1 ...
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu> wrote:
> >> "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
>
> >>> Phineas Bunce wrote:
> >>>> "Naked G ...
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu> wrote:
> >> "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
>
> >>> Phineas Bunce wrote:
> >>>> "Naked G ...
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 7, 11:35 pm, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu> wrote:
> >> "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
>
> >>> Phineas Bunce wrote:
> >>>> "Nake ...
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu> wrote:
> >> "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
>
> >>> Phineas Bunce wrote:
> >>>> "Naked G ...
|
Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" <CapnBunce@Spanish_main.eu> wrote:
> >> "DB001" <eugene.osulli...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
>
> >>> Phineas Bunce wrote:
> >>>> "Naked G ...
|
|
|
