|
|
|
Re: PC always active on Router display
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:59:24 -0800 (PST)
On 11 Jan, 16:51, PeeGee <tries...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Marge wrote:
> > On 10 Jan, 15:39, "Will" <1...@1.fr> wrote:
> > Socket on router is fine, if you have any physical indication on your
> > router, ie light for each socket. switch on a PC which is connected to
> > a particular socket & see it light up, then ...
|
Re: PC always active on Router display
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:49:33 -0800 (PST)
On 11 Jan, 22:27, "Will" <1...@1.fr> wrote:
> :o)
> supplies don't actually hum, just a figure of speech for wasting
> electricity.
>
> Socket on router is fine, if you have any physical indication on your
> router, ie light for each socket. switch on a PC which is connected to
> a particular socket & see it li ...
|
Re: PC always active on Router display
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:33:38 -0800 (PST)
On 10 Jan, 15:39, "Will" <1...@1.fr> wrote:
> > Thanks PeeGee,
> > I have mailed them to see, noticed they have a green hardware section,
> > maybe going back to making cards without WOL as an option would be
> > quite green?
>
> > I like being green to my pocket :o) I don't like things that draw
> > power when ...
|
Re: PC always active on Router display
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:37:34 -0800 (PST)
>
> You mean "go back to making" :-) I presume the 360 does not have "wake
> on LAN", which is the reason why most NICs and M/Bs have power and the
> interface "semi-live".
>
> I don't know if it will actually do what you want, but Scan computers
> have a Dynamode NC1000TX-R card (Scan code LN21674, URL:http:/ ...
|
Re: PC always active on Router display
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:24:45 -0800 (PST)
>
> In that case; see above. ?Buy a cheap & cheerful (simple) hub/repeater and
> plug the 360, PC, router/modem/existing network into that. Anything will do,
> add some power (yeah, sorry it'll be another brick most likely), and I think
> all your problems will go away.
> - After that you're into a bit of light ...
|
fast 8 port modem routers
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Looking for any recomendations !! ...
|
Re: PC always active on Router display
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 01:18:39 -0800 (PST)
On 23 Dec 2008, 22:43, PeeGee <tries...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Marge wrote:
> > On 23 Dec, 18:44, Marge <marge1...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Disabling network doesn't free the router socket, not sure if
> >> disabling network before shutting down would help, I wonder if its
> >> possible to start the PC witho ...
|
Re: PC always active on Router display
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 01:14:43 -0800 (PST)
On 24 Dec 2008, 15:07, "Will" <1...@1.fr> wrote:
> "Marge" <marge1...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:83c83123-3b81-4856-9210-26c5631fe7d8@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 23 Dec, 18:44, Marge <marge1...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >>Disabling network doesn't free the router socket, ...
|
CAT5e DC resistance
Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:09:20 +0000
Does anyone know if the resistance/100M quoted for CAT5e solid cable is
per conductor or per pair or for the cable as a whole? I suspect it's
per conductor but can't find a definite statement on the web.
--
Clint Sharp ...
|
S L O W Windows Networking
04 Jan 2009 09:18:02 GMT
In the off chance someone has an idea, what would be a logical
explanation to a couple of windows machines, linked via a simple cheap
switch, both forced to full duplex 100mb - taking nearly 2 days to
transfer 10 2gb files from one box to the other?
Should I focus on the core operating system, NIC's or switch ...
|
|
|
